Modern militaries are steadily integrating ground robots—often called robotic combat vehicles (RCVs) or autonomous ground systems (AGS)—as force multipliers that enhance the reach, endurance, and situational awareness of human units. These platforms handle hazardous or burdensome tasks, allowing squads and platoons to operate more safely and focus on mission execution.

Ukraine’s extensive use of unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), including the delivery of more than 150 Milrem THeMIS systems through a Dutch-led initiative, illustrates how rapidly these technologies are entering real conflict zones. Confirmed deployments indicate a steady expansion of robotic support on the battlefield.

UGVs are particularly valuable for reconnaissance and threat detection in complex environments such as dense urban areas, where mines, improvised explosives, and ambushes can be hidden. Equipped with cameras, thermal imagers, mapping tools, and optional autonomy modules, these systems move ahead of units to identify hazards, reducing exposure to unseen threats.

In active conflict zones, ground robots are primarily used for logistics support, route clearance, casualty evacuation, and remote sensing. While some platforms can be fitted with remote weapon stations, public use focuses mainly on support tasks, with engagement decisions kept firmly within a human-in-the-loop framework.

Logistics and mobility remain strong near-term applications. Robotic “mule” systems, such as the U.S. Army’s Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (S-MET), carry equipment, resupply units, and reduce the physical load on infantry. Similar platforms have shown potential in casualty evacuation, engineering support, and communications relay. Experimental systems like the FireAnt UGV highlight interest in small, agile robots that can detect and track armored vehicles or operate in coordinated groups, though these remain in testing.

Challenges still limit full integration. Maintaining reliable communications in contested environments is difficult, and power management constrains endurance, though hybrid-electric designs are extending operating time. Trust and human interaction are critical: operators must understand how systems perceive the environment, behave under stress, and when manual intervention is necessary. Research shows operators often override automation when uncertainty is high, emphasizing the need for predictable AI behavior.

Continued investment in uncrewed ground systems, reflected in the U.S. Department of Defense’s multibillion-dollar yearly spending, suggests that 2025 is a meaningful turning point. As AI-assisted perception, sensor fusion, mobility, and mesh networking mature, ground robots will increasingly operate as teammates rather than just tools. By pairing human judgment with robotic persistence and sensing, military units can operate more safely, gather better intelligence, and adapt more quickly to evolving threats—marking a significant evolution in how ground forces fight and survive on the modern battlefield.

Post By: A. Tuter

Terms of Use: Unauthorized copying is prohibited; we maintain dated records to document original publication. Content is provided “as is” and may contain inaccuracies; use it at your own risk. See our Terms Page.